Platonic Paradox :: essays research papers

To research Platos paradox in the Meno, we can first consult the definition of what platonism is. Websters narrows platonism as "actual things atomic number 18 copies of prodigious ideas and that these ideas are the objects of true knowledge apprehended by reminiscence." For this essay, we leave behind assume that trancendency is- "that which is beyond comprehension", and reminiscence as "past experience". The Meno is a conference between Socrates, a scholar and Meno, who in the end became an explorer. For this essay, however, we will assume that Meno is at the time of the dialogue, an upper-class citizen of average to better than average intelligence and superior stubbornness. The piece, fit to the translation by G.M.A. Grube is thought to get down taken place in approximately 402 B.C. in Athens, Greece. Late in the text, a third character, Anytus, a politician, who would eventually be an accuser of Socrates, joins in the dialogue. In the text, Meno in trying to define virtue accidentally slips in to a paradox or contradictory statement, which Socrates immediately refutes. It is the employment of this paper to recognize the paradox, examine how Socrates disproves the paradox through argument and evidence. Socrates also brings up a key distinction between true opinion and knowledge, relating to the paradox, which will too be examined. Socrates then gives basis for more argument regarding the paradox, and why he does this will also be examined. The initial argument takes place when Socrates challenges Meno to define virtue. Meno does non realize here what he has started. Meno has before inquired whether virtue is a quality that can be taught or if it is a natural trait, that men are born with. Socrates, in method true to form, twists the question and re-poses it to Meno to see if Meno can answer it all on his own. Meno lists what he thinks are virtuous qualities, and is content at that simple definition. Socrates then says &quo tI seem to be in luck, Meno, while I am looking for one virtue, I have found you to have a whole swarm of them."Menos frustration begins to set in. He tries theatrical metaphor to define virtue, as well as relating to physical philosophy and philosophers much(prenominal) as Empedocles.Meno at this point gives up and hands the philosophy to Socrates. Socrates presents Meno with a paradox"....He cannot search for what (a debater) knows- since he knows it, there is no need to search- nor for what he does not know, for he does not know what to look for.